The Priests and the Priests: An Instance of Holiness
- Caleb Oladejo

- May 25
- 5 min read

There is a moment in the book of Ezekiel that quietly unveils one of the most sobering truths about God, something that carries a weight that cannot be ignored. It reveals that not all who stand in God’s house stand equally before Him. There are those who serve within His courts, carrying out duties and maintaining order, and there are those who are granted the privilege of drawing near to His presence. The difference between these two is not gifting, not title, nor appointment—it is holiness. Let me show you.
The roots of this divine separation among the priests can be traced back to one of the darkest patterns in Israel’s history—the season when the nation repeatedly turned away from God into idolatry, and the priesthood itself became compromised.
After the reign of David and Solomon, the kingdom of Israel was divided. In the northern kingdom, under Jeroboam, a deliberate system of false worship was established. Altars were raised outside of God’s ordained pattern, golden calves were introduced, and worship was redirected away from Jerusalem. In order to sustain this system, Jeroboam appointed priests who were not of the proper order, men who would serve his political and religious agenda rather than the command of God.
As the nation drifted, many of the Levites—who had been entrusted with the service of God—went along with the corruption. Instead of resisting the deviation, they adapted to it. They ministered before idols, participated in defiled worship, and allowed the sacred responsibilities given to them to be mixed with practices that God had clearly forbidden. Over time, what should have been a holy priesthood became entangled with the spiritual decline of the people.
Yet, in the midst of this widespread compromise, there remained a remnant. Among the priestly line were the sons of Zadok, who chose a different path. While others adjusted themselves to the changing spiritual climate, they held fast to the charge of the sanctuary. They refused to participate in idolatry, refused to dilute their consecration, and remained aligned with God even when the majority had gone astray.
It is this historical divergence that forms the basis of God’s words in Ezekiel. The Levites who had joined in the nation’s unfaithfulness were not entirely removed from service, but their previous compromise carried consequences. They would serve, but at a distance. They would remain in the house, but they would not approach the presence in the same way.
On the other hand, the sons of Zadok, who had preserved their faithfulness in a season of widespread corruption, were marked out for a different privilege. Their consistency in honoring God, even when it was difficult and costly, secured for them something greater than position—it secured nearness.
In Ezekiel 40:45–46 (KJV), a distinction is introduced that may easily be overlooked if not carefully considered:
“And he said unto me, This chamber… is for the priests, the keepers of the charge of the house. And the chamber… is for the priests, the keepers of the charge of the altar: these are the sons of Zadok… which come near to the LORD to minister unto him.”
At first glance, both groups appear identical. They are all priests. They are all engaged in service. Yet, a closer look reveals a defining difference—only one group is described as those who “come near to the LORD.” This is not a casual detail; it is the dividing line. The explanation for this separation is given more fully in Ezekiel 44:10–13 (KJV):
“And the Levites that are gone away far from me, when Israel went astray… they shall even bear their iniquity. Yet they shall be ministers in my sanctuary… But they shall not come near unto me, to do the office of a priest unto me…”
This is a striking reality. These Levites did not lose their position entirely. They were not cast out of the sanctuary. They continued in ministry. Yet, there was a restriction placed upon them—a boundary they could not cross. God’s words are clear: “They shall not come near unto me.” This is not a removal from service, but a reduction in proximity. In contrast, another group is presented in Ezekiel 44:15 (KJV):
“But the priests the Levites, the sons of Zadok… which kept the charge of my sanctuary when the children of Israel went astray from me, they shall come near to me to minister unto me…”
Here lies the defining principle. While one group retained function, the other retained intimacy. While one group served in the house, the other stood before God. And the difference between them was not circumstance, but faithfulness in the midst of corruption. This passage establishes a truth that remains consistent throughout Scripture: nearness to God is not granted by position, but by consecration. The Levites who went astray did not cease to be priests, but they lost something far greater—the privilege of closeness. God, in His justice, did not remove them, but He restricted them.
"Once Saved Forever Saved, Come Closer"
This confronts a subtle but dangerous assumption—the belief that once a person has been established in God, their closeness to Him is permanently secured, regardless of how they live. These priests could have easily reasoned within themselves, “We are priests; this is our identity.” And in one sense, they were correct. But identity did not guarantee access. God, as it were, affirmed their position while redefining their experience: they would remain in service, but they would not all stand before Him.
What makes this even more sobering is that God’s declaration was not presented as a temporary correction. It was not framed as a passing discipline that would soon be lifted. Rather, it carried the tone of lasting consequence: “They shall not come near unto me…” (Ezekiel 44:13, KJV) This was not a momentary setback. It was a sustained limitation of access.
Against this backdrop, the faithfulness of the sons of Zadok shines even more clearly. They existed within the same environment as the others. They witnessed the same national drift, the same idolatry, the same pressures that led others astray. Yet, the Scripture records a simple but powerful testimony concerning them:
“…they kept the charge of my sanctuary…” (Ezekiel 44:15, KJV)
They remained faithful where others compromised. They preserved what others neglected. And as a result, their reward was not merely continued service—it was proximity to God Himself. “They shall come near to me.” This is the reward that heaven esteems above all others. This principle is not isolated to Ezekiel; it reflects the consistent character of God. In 1 Samuel 2:30 (KJV), the Lord declares:
“For them that honour me I will honour, and they that despise me shall be lightly esteemed.”
God does not change in His ways. He continues to respond to honor with honor, and to disregard with distance. Therefore, this passage is not merely a historical account of priestly order; it is a spiritual revelation that speaks directly to the present. It exposes a reality that still exists among believers today. There are many who are active in the house of God, yet few who truly draw near to Him. There are many engaged in service, yet fewer who stand in deep communion.
The distinguishing factor remains unchanged—consecration.
This leads to a necessary and personal question: is it enough to serve God, or is there a deeper desire to stand before Him? Scripture makes it clear that service can continue even where nearness has been lost. Activity can remain, even when intimacy has diminished. But the call of God is not merely to function—it is to draw near.
In the end, the passage reveals a truth that must not be overlooked: God did not create two categories of priests. It was faithfulness, or the lack of it, that established the distinction.



Comments